CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Honduras

Honduras: CPIA equity of public resource use rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 12.5%
World rank
30th
of 85 countries
All-time high
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2014
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Honduras, 2005–2025

0123452005201520252005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high2020: 4 1=low to 6=high2021: 4 1=low to 6=high2022: 4 1=low to 6=high2023: 4 1=low to 6=high2024: 4 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia equity of public resource use rating in Honduras is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of down 12.5% on the previous year and down 22.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Honduras peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.

Honduras ranks 30th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Honduras, year by year

Annual values for CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) in Honduras, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 4 1=low to 6=high
2006 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 4.5 1=low to 6=high +12.5%
2015 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 4 1=low to 6=high -11.1%
2019 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3.5 1=low to 6=high -12.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4.2 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.92 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Honduras

  1. 30 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 30 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 30 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 30 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 30 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 30 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 30 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 30 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 30 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 30 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 30 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 30 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 30 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 30 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 30 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 30 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 30 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 30 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 30 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 30 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 30 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 30 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 30 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 30 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Honduras

All data for Honduras →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in Honduras?
Cpia equity of public resource use rating in Honduras was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Honduras?
The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Honduras?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
How does Honduras rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
Honduras ranks 30th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in Honduras?
Over the last ten years it is down 22.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Honduras data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Honduras. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/honduras/">CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Honduras</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.