Guinea-Bissau vs South Sudan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Guinea-Bissau
2 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
South Sudan
2 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
83rd
South Sudan rank
83rd
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- South Sudan
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2 1=low to 6=high against 2 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 14 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 83rd and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 85 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.12 1=low to 6=high | 2.12 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Guinea-Bissau or South Sudan?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 2 1=low to 6=high against 2 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 83rd and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.