CPIA equity of public resource use rating in South Sudan
South Sudan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA equity of public resource use rating in South Sudan, 2012–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
South Sudan recorded 2 1=low to 6=high for cpia equity of public resource use rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia equity of public resource use rating in South Sudan peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2014.
South Sudan ranks 83rd of 85 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 14 years of available data.
CPIA equity of public resource use rating in South Sudan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -20.0% |
| 2015 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.12 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 8 |
| 2020s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near South Sudan
- 83 Guinea-Bissau 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 85 Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for South Sudan
- Arms imports 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.9073 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0016 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2015)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 25 % change on previous year (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 169.79 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.096 current USD per US$ of GDP (2015)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 88.44 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 2.03 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 15.82 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in South Sudan?
- Cpia equity of public resource use rating in South Sudan was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in South Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in South Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
- How does South Sudan rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- South Sudan ranks 83rd out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in South Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this South Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.