IDA only vs Pakistan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
IDA only
3.36 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Pakistan
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
IDA only rank
27th
Pakistan rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- IDA only
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in IDA only, a difference of 0.14 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
IDA only ranks 27th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.1258 1=low to 6=high | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.1404 1=low to 6=high | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.143 1=low to 6=high | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IDA only or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IDA only and Pakistan?
- 0.14 1=low to 6=high, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Pakistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do IDA only and Pakistan rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- IDA only ranks 27th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.