Statizoid

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan

Pakistan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
30th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Pakistan 30th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.5 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Pakistan

  1. 30 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 30 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 30 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 30 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 30 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 30 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 30 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 30 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 30 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 30 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 30 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 30 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 30 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 30 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 30 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 30 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 30 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 30 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 30 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 30 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 30 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 30 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 30 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 30 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Pakistan

All data for Pakistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan?
Cpia equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Pakistan?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Pakistan?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Pakistan rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
Pakistan ranks 30th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in Pakistan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Pakistan data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/pakistan/">CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Pakistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.