Saint Lucia vs Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Saint Lucia
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Zimbabwe
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Saint Lucia rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Saint Lucia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 1.4 1=low to 6=high | 2.4 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 3.85 1=low to 6=high | 2.65 1=low to 6=high | 1.2 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.4167 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Saint Lucia or Zimbabwe?
- Saint Lucia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Saint Lucia ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.