Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Micronesia, Federated States of: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 56th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 56th of 84 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2015.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 56th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 56th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.