CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) by country

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These...

Countries reporting
85
Highest
5 1=low to 6=high
Kenya
Lowest
1 1=low to 6=high
Afghanistan
Median
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Years covered
21
2005–2025
Data points
2,460

What the numbers show

CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) is currently reported for 85 countries. The highest value is 5 1=low to 6=high in Kenya; the lowest is 1 1=low to 6=high in Afghanistan.

The median across all reporting countries is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, and the mean is 3.49 1=low to 6=high.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 5.

Over the past decade 21 countries rose and 21 fell. The largest increase was in Gambia (up 75.0%), and the largest decrease in Afghanistan (down 71.4%).

CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Kenya 5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 11.1% rising
2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 18.2% falling
2 Georgia 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
2 Grenada 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 28.6% rising
2 India 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
2 Saint Lucia 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 28.6% rising
2 Moldova 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2019 up 28.6% rising
2 Mauritania 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.5% rising
2 Tanzania 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.5% rising
2 Samoa 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
2 Kosovo 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 28.6% rising
2 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 28.6% rising
14 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high 2010 down 11.1% falling
14 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged falling
14 Cote d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
14 Democratic Republic of Congo 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
14 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Dominica 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
14 Guinea 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
14 Guinea-Bissau 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 60.0% rising
14 Guyana 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% flat
14 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Madagascar 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
14 Mali 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Niger 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
14 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
14 Rwanda 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
14 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
14 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 33.3% flat
14 Uganda 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
14 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
14 Vietnam 4 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 20.0% falling
14 Vanuatu 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
39 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
39 Central African Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
39 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% flat
39 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
39 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
39 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% falling
39 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 75.0% falling
39 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
39 Haiti 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
39 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
39 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
39 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
39 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2019 unchanged falling
39 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
39 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
39 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
39 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
39 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% falling
57 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
57 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
57 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 25.0% falling
57 Bolivia 3 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 25.0% falling
57 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
57 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% flat
57 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
57 Micronesia (country) 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
57 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
57 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% flat
57 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
57 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 25.0% falling
57 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
57 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% falling
57 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 25.0% falling
57 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
57 East Timor 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% rising
57 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
75 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 16.7% falling
75 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 25.0% rising
75 Zimbabwe 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 16.7% rising
78 Maldives 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling
78 Malawi 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling
78 Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling
78 Yemen 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling
82 Eritrea 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
82 Myanmar 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 57.1% falling
82 South Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
85 Afghanistan 1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 71.4% falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA macroeconomic management rating by country. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/">CPIA macroeconomic management rating by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.