Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Viet Nam: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Viet Nam, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 14th of 85 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.8 1=low to 6=high | 1.3 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 0.4167 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Viet Nam?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Viet Nam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Viet Nam?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Viet Nam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Viet Nam rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 14th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.