Eritrea vs South Sudan: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Eritrea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.5 1=low to 6=high against 1.5 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Eritrea ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | 1.44 1=low to 6=high | 0.0625 1=low to 6=high | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | 1.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Eritrea or South Sudan?
- Eritrea, at 1.5 1=low to 6=high against 1.5 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and South Sudan rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Eritrea ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.