Europe & Central Asia vs Moldova: CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Europe & Central Asia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.12 1=low to 6=high in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0.38 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Europe & Central Asia ahead.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 2nd of 42 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 0.4461 1=low to 6=high | Europe & Central Asia |
| 2010s | 3.95 1=low to 6=high | 4.25 1=low to 6=high | 0.3032 1=low to 6=high | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Europe & Central Asia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.12 1=low to 6=high in Europe & Central Asia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Europe & Central Asia and Moldova?
- 0.38 1=low to 6=high, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Europe & Central Asia and Moldova rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 2nd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.