Lower middle income vs Viet Nam: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Lower middle income
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.51 1=low to 6=high in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.49 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Lower middle income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Lower middle income ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 14th of 42 groups.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 4.8 1=low to 6=high | 1.15 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 3.66 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 0.252 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Lower middle income or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.51 1=low to 6=high in Lower middle income as of 2015.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Lower middle income and Viet Nam?
- 0.49 1=low to 6=high, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Viet Nam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Lower middle income and Viet Nam rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Lower middle income ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 14th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.