Republic of Moldova vs Tanzania, United Republic of: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 2nd of 85 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 4.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.9 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 4.25 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Republic of Moldova or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Republic of Moldova, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 2nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.