Upper middle income vs Vanuatu: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Upper middle income
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.56 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income, a difference of 0.44 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.1 times Upper middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Upper middle income ahead.
Upper middle income ranks 14th and Vanuatu ranks 13th of 42 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Upper middle income averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Upper middle income | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.2966 1=low to 6=high | Upper middle income |
| 2010s | 3.64 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.3648 1=low to 6=high | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 3.64 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.3613 1=low to 6=high | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Upper middle income or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.56 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Upper middle income and Vanuatu?
- 0.44 1=low to 6=high, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Upper middle income and Vanuatu?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Upper middle income and Vanuatu rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Upper middle income ranks 14th and Vanuatu ranks 13th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.