Fiji vs IDA blend: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating over time
- Fiji
- IDA blend
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.47 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend, a difference of 0.53 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times IDA blend's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 3rd and IDA blend ranks 5th of 85 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating, Fiji or IDA blend?
- Fiji, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.47 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating between Fiji and IDA blend?
- 0.53 1=low to 6=high, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and IDA blend?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and IDA blend rank globally for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Fiji ranks 3rd and IDA blend ranks 5th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.