CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) by country

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for...

Countries reporting
85
Highest
4.5 1=low to 6=high
Rwanda
Lowest
1 1=low to 6=high
South Sudan
Median
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Years covered
21
2005–2025
Data points
2,460

What the numbers show

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) is currently reported for 85 countries. The highest value is 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda; the lowest is 1 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan.

The median across all reporting countries is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, and the mean is 3.22 1=low to 6=high.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 4.

Over the past decade 28 countries rose and 15 fell. The largest increase was in Cote d'Ivoire (up 33.3%), and the largest decrease in South Sudan (down 50.0%).

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.5% rising
1 Togo 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 28.6% rising
3 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
3 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
3 Bhutan 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
3 Cote d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 33.3% rising
3 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 33.3% rising
3 Fiji 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
3 Guinea 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
3 Grenada 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
3 India 4 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 14.3% rising
3 Kenya 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
3 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% flat
3 Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high 2019 up 14.3% rising
3 Vietnam 4 1=low to 6=high 2015 up 14.3% rising
3 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
17 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
17 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 16.7% rising
17 Bolivia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2015 unchanged flat
17 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
17 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
17 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
17 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% rising
17 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
17 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
17 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
17 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% flat
17 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2019 up 16.7% rising
17 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Niger 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
17 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
17 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
17 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
17 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
17 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
17 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
17 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
45 Armenia 3 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 14.3% falling
45 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high 2010 unchanged flat
45 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
45 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
45 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 25.0% flat
45 Micronesia (country) 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
45 Georgia 3 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 14.3% falling
45 Guinea-Bissau 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% rising
45 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% flat
45 Honduras 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% rising
45 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% flat
45 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
45 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
45 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% flat
45 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
45 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
45 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
45 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% rising
45 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
45 Chad 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% rising
45 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
45 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
45 Tanzania 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
45 Yemen 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
45 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% flat
70 Angola 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged falling
70 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
70 Congo 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 16.7% falling
70 Djibouti 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
70 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 28.6% falling
70 Nicaragua 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 28.6% falling
70 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 25.0% rising
70 Solomon Islands 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
70 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 25.0% rising
79 Afghanistan 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.0% falling
79 Eritrea 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
79 Haiti 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.0% falling
79 Myanmar 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.0% falling
79 Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
79 East Timor 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
85 South Sudan 1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 50.0% falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating by country. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/">CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.