Guinea vs IBRD only: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating over time
- Guinea
- IBRD only
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only, a difference of 0.25 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was IBRD only ahead.
Guinea ranks 3rd and IBRD only ranks 1st of 85 countries.
IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | 0.7215 1=low to 6=high | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | 0.3356 1=low to 6=high | IBRD only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating, Guinea or IBRD only?
- Guinea, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating between Guinea and IBRD only?
- 0.25 1=low to 6=high, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and IBRD only?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and IBRD only rank globally for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Guinea ranks 3rd and IBRD only ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.