Kosovo vs Middle income: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating over time
- Kosovo
- Middle income
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.3 1=low to 6=high in Middle income, a difference of 0.2 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.1 times Middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Middle income ahead.
Kosovo ranks 17th and Middle income ranks 15th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Middle income in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 0.1545 1=low to 6=high | Middle income |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.2043 1=low to 6=high | Middle income |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 0.2043 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating, Kosovo or Middle income?
- Kosovo, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.3 1=low to 6=high in Middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating between Kosovo and Middle income?
- 0.2 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Middle income?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Kosovo and Middle income rank globally for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Kosovo ranks 17th and Middle income ranks 15th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.