Micronesia, Federated States of vs Sri Lanka: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 45th and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia, Federated States of averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.92 1=low to 6=high | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating, Micronesia, Federated States of or Sri Lanka?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating between Micronesia, Federated States of and Sri Lanka?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Sri Lanka rank globally for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 45th and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.