Mongolia vs Samoa: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating over time
- Mongolia
- Samoa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Samoa, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 17th and Samoa ranks 17th of 84 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 1.2 1=low to 6=high | Samoa |
| 2010s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating, Mongolia or Samoa?
- Mongolia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating between Mongolia and Samoa?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Samoa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Samoa rank globally for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Mongolia ranks 17th and Samoa ranks 17th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.