Mongolia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating over time
- Mongolia
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.27 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.23 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
Mongolia ranks 17th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 18th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 2.98 1=low to 6=high | 0.1815 1=low to 6=high | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2010s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 0.2477 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating, Mongolia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Mongolia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.27 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating between Mongolia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 0.23 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Mongolia ranks 17th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 18th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.