Malawi vs Micronesia, Federated States of: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating over time
- Malawi
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 9th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 9th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia, Federated States of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.4444 1=low to 6=high | Malawi |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | Micronesia, Federated States of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating, Malawi or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Malawi, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating between Malawi and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Malawi ranks 9th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 9th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.