CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Micronesia (country)
Micronesia (country): CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Micronesia (country), 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Micronesia (country) is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Micronesia (country) peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2021 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Micronesia (country) 9th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Micronesia (country), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)
- 9 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 9 Benin 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cote d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Georgia 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 9 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 9 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Rwanda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Micronesia (country)
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 62.15 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0158 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Tax revenue 7.0% (2020)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 10.9% (2020)
- Taxes on goods and services 3.4% (2020)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 10.5% (2020)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) 6.9% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.4% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Micronesia (country)?
- Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Micronesia (country) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2021.
- What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Micronesia (country) rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 9th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.