Micronesia, Federated States of vs Togo: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Togo
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Togo ahead.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 9th and Togo ranks 9th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia, Federated States of averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2020s | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating, Micronesia, Federated States of or Togo?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating between Micronesia, Federated States of and Togo?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Togo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Togo rank globally for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 9th and Togo ranks 9th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.