Angola vs Chad: CPIA structural policies cluster average

Angola
2.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Chad
2.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Angola rank
73rd
Chad rank
75th

CPIA structural policies cluster average over time

  • Angola
  • Chad
0123200520152025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 2.67 1=low to 6=high against 2.33 1=low to 6=high in Chad, a difference of 0.3333 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chad ahead.

Angola ranks 73rd and Chad ranks 75th of 83 countries.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.