CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) by country

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for...

Countries reporting
85
Highest
5 1=low to 6=high
Georgia
Lowest
1.17 1=low to 6=high
Eritrea
Median
3.33 1=low to 6=high
Years covered
21
2005–2025
Data points
2,460

What the numbers show

CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) is currently reported for 85 countries. The highest value is 5 1=low to 6=high in Georgia; the lowest is 1.17 1=low to 6=high in Eritrea.

The median across all reporting countries is 3.33 1=low to 6=high, and the mean is 3.23 1=low to 6=high.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 4.

Over the past decade 31 countries rose and 48 fell. The largest increase was in Georgia (up 36.4%), and the largest decrease in Sudan (down 37.5%).

CPIA structural policies cluster average: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Georgia 5 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 36.4% rising
2 Armenia 4.33 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 8.3% rising
3 Rwanda 4.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.0% rising
4 Kosovo 4.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 8.7% rising
4 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 4.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 8.7% rising
6 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.3% flat
7 Benin 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 9.5% flat
7 Fiji 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 9.5% rising
7 Kenya 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 0.0% flat
7 Nepal 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 9.5% rising
7 Senegal 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.2% flat
7 Togo 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 21.1% rising
13 Cote d'Ivoire 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 10.0% rising
13 Dominica 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.3% falling
13 Ghana 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% falling
13 Kyrgyzstan 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.3% falling
13 Saint Lucia 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.3% falling
13 Moldova 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2019 down 4.3% flat
13 Pakistan 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 10.0% falling
13 Samoa 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.3% falling
13 Zambia 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% rising
22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 4.3% flat
23 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2010 unchanged rising
23 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 8.7% falling
23 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 4.5% falling
23 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
23 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.5% falling
23 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.0% rising
23 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
23 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
23 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 23.5% rising
23 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 8.7% falling
23 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2015 up 5.0% rising
34 Burundi 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% rising
34 Burkina Faso 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.8% flat
34 Bhutan 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.3% rising
34 Cameroon 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.3% flat
34 Guinea 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 11.1% flat
34 Guyana 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 0.0% falling
34 Honduras 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.1% falling
34 Laos 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% rising
34 Madagascar 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 11.1% falling
34 Maldives 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.8% falling
34 Mauritania 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.3% falling
34 Malawi 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.3% flat
34 Nigeria 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.8% flat
34 Papua New Guinea 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.8% flat
34 Tanzania 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.1% falling
34 Vanuatu 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 0.0% flat
50 Bolivia 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 13.0% falling
51 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.6% rising
51 Djibouti 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% falling
51 Ethiopia 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% flat
51 Gambia 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.0% falling
51 Mali 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.5% falling
51 Mongolia 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2019 down 5.0% falling
51 Solomon Islands 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% rising
51 Sao Tome and Principe 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% flat
59 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
59 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
59 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% falling
59 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% flat
59 Tajikistan 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.9% falling
59 East Timor 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
59 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.5% rising
66 Micronesia (country) 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 0.0% flat
66 Guinea-Bissau 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.6% falling
66 Sierra Leone 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 10.5% falling
69 Bangladesh 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.1% falling
69 Congo 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.1% falling
69 Kiribati 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.9% falling
69 Marshall Islands 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 0.0% falling
69 Nicaragua 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 27.3% falling
69 Tuvalu 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.9% flat
75 Angola 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 5.9% falling
76 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 7.1% falling
77 Haiti 2.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 22.2% falling
77 Chad 2.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
79 Afghanistan 2.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 18.8% falling
79 Somalia 2.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 30.0% rising
81 South Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 7.7% falling
81 Yemen 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.0% falling
83 Myanmar 1.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 35.3% falling
84 Sudan 1.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 37.5% falling
85 Eritrea 1.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA structural policies cluster average by country. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/">CPIA structural policies cluster average by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.