Armenia, Republic of vs Rwanda: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Armenia, Republic of
- Rwanda
How they compare
Armenia, Republic of currently reports 4.33 1=low to 6=high against 4.33 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Armenia, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Armenia, Republic of ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 84 countries.
Armenia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia, Republic of | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.07 1=low to 6=high | 3.57 1=low to 6=high | 0.5067 1=low to 6=high | Armenia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 0.2083 1=low to 6=high | Armenia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Armenia, Republic of or Rwanda?
- Armenia, Republic of, at 4.33 1=low to 6=high against 4.33 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Armenia, Republic of and Rwanda?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Armenia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia, Republic of and Rwanda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Armenia, Republic of and Rwanda rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Armenia, Republic of ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.