Bhutan vs Madagascar, Republic of: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Bhutan
- Madagascar, Republic of
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Madagascar, Republic of, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar, Republic of ahead.
Bhutan ranks 33rd and Madagascar, Republic of ranks 33rd of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Madagascar, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.5267 1=low to 6=high | Madagascar, Republic of |
| 2010s | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 0.0333 1=low to 6=high | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Bhutan or Madagascar, Republic of?
- Bhutan, at 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Madagascar, Republic of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Bhutan and Madagascar, Republic of?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Madagascar, Republic of?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Madagascar, Republic of rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Bhutan ranks 33rd and Madagascar, Republic of ranks 33rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.