Burkina Faso vs Tanzania, United Republic of: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Burkina Faso
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 34th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.73 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 0.1944 1=low to 6=high | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Burkina Faso or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Burkina Faso, at 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 34th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.