Burundi vs Least developed countries: CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)

Burundi
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Least developed countries
2.98 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Burundi rank
34th
Least developed countries rank
37th

CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) over time

  • Burundi
  • Least developed countries
0123200520152025

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 2.98 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.35 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Burundi ranks 34th and Least developed countries ranks 37th of 85 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Least developed countries in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 2.93 1=low to 6=high 3.19 1=low to 6=high 0.2614 1=low to 6=high Least developed countries
2010s 3.23 1=low to 6=high 3.11 1=low to 6=high 0.1218 1=low to 6=high Burundi
2020s 3.22 1=low to 6=high 3.01 1=low to 6=high 0.2098 1=low to 6=high Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Burundi or Least developed countries?
Burundi, at 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 2.98 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Burundi and Least developed countries?
0.35 1=low to 6=high, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Least developed countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Burundi and Least developed countries rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
Burundi ranks 34th and Least developed countries ranks 37th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Least developed countries: CPIA structural policies cluster average. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/burundi/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/burundi/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Burundi vs Least developed countries: CPIA structural policies cluster average</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.