Comoros vs Niger: CPIA structural policies cluster average

Comoros
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Niger
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Comoros rank
57th
Niger rank
57th

CPIA structural policies cluster average over time

  • Comoros
  • Niger
01234200520152025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Niger, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 57th and Niger ranks 57th of 83 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 2.57 1=low to 6=high 3.36 1=low to 6=high 0.7867 1=low to 6=high Niger
2010s 2.98 1=low to 6=high 3.37 1=low to 6=high 0.3833 1=low to 6=high Niger
2020s 2.92 1=low to 6=high 3.22 1=low to 6=high 0.3056 1=low to 6=high Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Comoros or Niger?
Comoros, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Comoros and Niger?
0 1=low to 6=high, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Niger?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Niger rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
Comoros ranks 57th and Niger ranks 57th of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.