Congo vs Tuvalu: CPIA structural policies cluster average

Congo
2.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Tuvalu
2.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Congo rank
67th
Tuvalu rank
67th

CPIA structural policies cluster average over time

  • Congo
  • Tuvalu
0123200520152025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 2.67 1=low to 6=high against 2.67 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 67th and Tuvalu ranks 67th of 83 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tuvalu Difference Ahead
2010s 2.92 1=low to 6=high 2.77 1=low to 6=high 0.1458 1=low to 6=high Congo
2020s 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2.67 1=low to 6=high 0 1=low to 6=high

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Congo or Tuvalu?
Congo, at 2.67 1=low to 6=high against 2.67 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Congo and Tuvalu?
0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tuvalu?
14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Congo and Tuvalu rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
Congo ranks 67th and Tuvalu ranks 67th of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.