Early-demographic dividend vs Tonga: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Early-demographic dividend
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.18 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.32 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.
Early-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Tonga ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Early-demographic dividend | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 0.1731 1=low to 6=high | Early-demographic dividend |
| 2010s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 0.2828 1=low to 6=high | Tonga |
| 2020s | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 3.47 1=low to 6=high | 0.2471 1=low to 6=high | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Early-demographic dividend or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.18 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Early-demographic dividend and Tonga?
- 0.32 1=low to 6=high, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Tonga?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Early-demographic dividend and Tonga rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Tonga ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.