IDA blend vs Nepal: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- IDA blend
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 3.83 1=low to 6=high against 3.46 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend, a difference of 0.37 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times IDA blend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was IDA blend ahead.
IDA blend ranks 6th and Nepal ranks 6th of 41 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, IDA blend averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 0.1666 1=low to 6=high | IDA blend |
| 2010s | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 0.0189 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
| 2020s | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 3.81 1=low to 6=high | 0.39 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, IDA blend or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 3.83 1=low to 6=high against 3.46 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between IDA blend and Nepal?
- 0.37 1=low to 6=high, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Nepal?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do IDA blend and Nepal rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- IDA blend ranks 6th and Nepal ranks 6th of 41 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.