Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Nepal: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Nepal
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 4.17 1=low to 6=high against 3.83 1=low to 6=high in Nepal, a difference of 0.34 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 4th and Nepal ranks 7th of 85 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 0.8333 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 3.97 1=low to 6=high | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 0.5333 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2020s | 4.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.81 1=low to 6=high | 0.3611 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Nepal?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 4.17 1=low to 6=high against 3.83 1=low to 6=high in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Nepal?
- 0.34 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Nepal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Nepal rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 4th and Nepal ranks 7th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.