Kosovo vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Kosovo
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 4.17 1=low to 6=high against 4.17 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 4th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 4th of 85 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3.97 1=low to 6=high | 3.97 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 4.17 1=low to 6=high | 4.17 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Kosovo or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo, at 4.17 1=low to 6=high against 4.17 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Kosovo and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Kosovo and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Kosovo ranks 4th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 4th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.