Middle income vs Republic of Moldova: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Middle income
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Middle income, a difference of 0.34 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Middle income's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Middle income ranks 14th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 42 groups.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle income | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | 3.73 1=low to 6=high | 0.2366 1=low to 6=high | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.309 1=low to 6=high | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Middle income or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Middle income and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.34 1=low to 6=high, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle income and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Middle income and Republic of Moldova rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Middle income ranks 14th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.