Moldova vs Samoa: CPIA structural policies cluster average

Moldova
3.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Samoa
3.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Moldova rank
11th
Samoa rank
11th

CPIA structural policies cluster average over time

  • Moldova
  • Samoa
01234200520152025

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.67 1=low to 6=high in Samoa, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 11th and Samoa ranks 11th of 83 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 3.73 1=low to 6=high 4.07 1=low to 6=high 0.34 1=low to 6=high Samoa
2010s 3.7 1=low to 6=high 3.88 1=low to 6=high 0.1833 1=low to 6=high Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Moldova or Samoa?
Moldova, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.67 1=low to 6=high in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Moldova and Samoa?
0 1=low to 6=high, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Samoa?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Moldova and Samoa rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
Moldova ranks 11th and Samoa ranks 11th of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.