Myanmar vs Sudan: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Myanmar
- Sudan
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 1.83 1=low to 6=high against 1.67 1=low to 6=high in Sudan, a difference of 0.16 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 83rd and Sudan ranks 84th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 2.64 1=low to 6=high | 0.2381 1=low to 6=high | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 2.08 1=low to 6=high | 2.19 1=low to 6=high | 0.1111 1=low to 6=high | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Myanmar or Sudan?
- Myanmar, at 1.83 1=low to 6=high against 1.67 1=low to 6=high in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Myanmar and Sudan?
- 0.16 1=low to 6=high, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Myanmar and Sudan rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Myanmar ranks 83rd and Sudan ranks 84th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.