South Sudan vs Sudan: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- South Sudan
- Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2 1=low to 6=high against 1.67 1=low to 6=high in Sudan, a difference of 0.33 1=low to 6=high.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 80th and Sudan ranks 83rd of 84 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.1 1=low to 6=high | 2.63 1=low to 6=high | 0.5208 1=low to 6=high | Sudan |
| 2020s | 1.97 1=low to 6=high | 2.19 1=low to 6=high | 0.2222 1=low to 6=high | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, South Sudan or Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2 1=low to 6=high against 1.67 1=low to 6=high in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between South Sudan and Sudan?
- 0.33 1=low to 6=high, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Sudan rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- South Sudan ranks 80th and Sudan ranks 83rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.