Tajikistan vs East Timor: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Tajikistan
- East Timor
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 58th and East Timor ranks 58th of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 2.66 1=low to 6=high | 0.6833 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 2.95 1=low to 6=high | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.05 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 2.86 1=low to 6=high | 2.89 1=low to 6=high | 0.0278 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Tajikistan or East Timor?
- Tajikistan, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Tajikistan and East Timor?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and East Timor?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Tajikistan and East Timor rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Tajikistan ranks 58th and East Timor ranks 58th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.