Mozambique vs Viet Nam: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Mozambique
5.95
in 2019
Viet Nam
5.77
in 2019
Mozambique rank
41st
Viet Nam rank
44th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Mozambique
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 5.95 against 5.77 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 41st and Viet Nam ranks 44th of 173 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4.29 | 0.9944 | 3.29 | Mozambique |
| 1980s | 3.45 | 0.9835 | 2.46 | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 5.77 | 2.04 | 3.73 | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 7.13 | 3.88 | 3.24 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 8.18 | 5.24 | 2.94 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Mozambique or Viet Nam?
- Mozambique, at 5.95 against 5.77 in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Mozambique and Viet Nam?
- 0.18, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Viet Nam?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Viet Nam rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Mozambique ranks 41st and Viet Nam ranks 44th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.