Azerbaijan vs India: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Azerbaijan
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 3.7 1=low to 6=high against 3.68 1=low to 6=high in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.02 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was India ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 18th and India ranks 15th of 84 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 0.0483 1=low to 6=high | India |
| 2010s | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 3.74 1=low to 6=high | 0.0583 1=low to 6=high | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Azerbaijan or India?
- India, at 3.7 1=low to 6=high against 3.68 1=low to 6=high in Azerbaijan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Azerbaijan and India?
- 0.02 1=low to 6=high, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and India?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Azerbaijan and India rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 18th and India ranks 15th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).