IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) was 3.68 1=low to 6=high in 2010. ▬ Flat
IDA resource allocation index in Azerbaijan, 2005–2010
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Azerbaijan recorded 3.68 1=low to 6=high for ida resource allocation index in 2010.
The figure is down 3.9% on the previous year and up 0.9% over ten years.
Azerbaijan ranks 19th of 85 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | +1.8% |
| 2008 | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2010 | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | -3.9% |
Azerbaijan compared with similar countries
- Azerbaijan's 3.68 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.6 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Azerbaijan's 3.68 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3.72 1=low to 6=high, 99% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 1 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
More public sector data for Azerbaijan
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 463.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.74 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0004 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 833.33 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ida resource allocation index in Azerbaijan?
- Ida resource allocation index in Azerbaijan was 3.68 1=low to 6=high in 2010, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.83 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.65 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for ida resource allocation index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 19th out of 85 countries with data for 2010.
- Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).