Azerbaijan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Azerbaijan
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 3.68 1=low to 6=high against 3.62 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.06 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 18th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 21st of 84 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.88 1=low to 6=high | 0.13 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 0.0667 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Azerbaijan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Azerbaijan, at 3.68 1=low to 6=high against 3.62 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2010.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Azerbaijan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.06 1=low to 6=high, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Azerbaijan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 18th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 21st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).