Azerbaijan vs Vietnam: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 3.69 1=low to 6=high against 3.68 1=low to 6=high in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.01 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Vietnam ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 19th and Vietnam ranks 18th of 85 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 0.05 1=low to 6=high | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | 0.0917 1=low to 6=high | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Azerbaijan or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 3.69 1=low to 6=high against 3.68 1=low to 6=high in Azerbaijan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Azerbaijan and Vietnam?
- 0.01 1=low to 6=high, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Vietnam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Azerbaijan and Vietnam rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Azerbaijan ranks 19th and Vietnam ranks 18th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).