What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?

0.05 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?

9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.

Where does this data come from?

CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: IDA resource allocation index

Bosnia and Herzegovina

3.6 1=low to 6=high

in 2013

Cambodia

3.55 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

23rd

Cambodia rank

25th

IDA resource allocation index over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cambodia

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.6 1=low to 6=high against 3.55 1=low to 6=high in Cambodia, a difference of 0.05 1=low to 6=high.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd and Cambodia ranks 25th of 85 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Cambodia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	3.67 1=low to 6=high	3.21 1=low to 6=high	0.4583 1=low to 6=high	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s	3.65 1=low to 6=high	3.41 1=low to 6=high	0.2375 1=low to 6=high	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cambodia?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.6 1=low to 6=high against 3.55 1=low to 6=high in Cambodia as of 2013.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?: 0.05 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?: 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia rank globally for ida resource allocation index?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd and Cambodia ranks 25th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cambodia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).