IDA resource allocation index in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: IDA resource allocation index was 3.6 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
IDA resource allocation index in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Bosnia and Herzegovina recorded 3.6 1=low to 6=high for ida resource allocation index in 2013.
That represents a change of down 1.1% on the previous year and up 0.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 3.71 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3.59 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Bosnia and Herzegovina 23rd out of 85 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
IDA resource allocation index in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | +2.1% |
| 2007 | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.64 1=low to 6=high | -1.8% |
| 2012 | 3.64 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 20 Mauritania 3.65 1=low to 6=high compare
- 21 Kyrgyzstan 3.64 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Tanzania, United Republic of 3.62 1=low to 6=high compare
- 24 Fiji 3.57 1=low to 6=high
- 25 Cambodia 3.55 1=low to 6=high compare
- 26 Burkina Faso 3.53 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Arms imports 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 3.7 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 68.25 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0073 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 9.45 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 215.97 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 234.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre 3,854 current USD per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ida resource allocation index in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Ida resource allocation index in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 3.6 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 3.71 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.59 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for ida resource allocation index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).