Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.6 1=low to 6=high against 3.14 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.46 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 85 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 0.505 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 0.4653 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.6 1=low to 6=high against 3.14 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 0.46 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).