Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tanzania, United Republic of?

Tanzania, United Republic of, at 3.62 1=low to 6=high against 3.14 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.

What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?

0.48 1=low to 6=high, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?

21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IDA resource allocation index

Sub-Saharan Africa

3.14 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Tanzania, United Republic of

3.62 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Sub-Saharan Africa rank

23rd

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

22nd

IDA resource allocation index over time

Sub-Saharan Africa
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 3.62 1=low to 6=high against 3.14 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.48 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 22nd of 42 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sub-Saharan Africa	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	3.17 1=low to 6=high	3.88 1=low to 6=high	0.715 1=low to 6=high	Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s	3.16 1=low to 6=high	3.67 1=low to 6=high	0.5136 1=low to 6=high	Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s	3.13 1=low to 6=high	3.52 1=low to 6=high	0.3966 1=low to 6=high	Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Tanzania, United Republic of, at 3.62 1=low to 6=high against 3.14 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.48 1=low to 6=high, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for ida resource allocation index?: Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).